A woman has sued McDonald's,
saying she was injured when a worker at a Los Angeles restaurant
spilled hot coffee on her. The lawsuit comes 20 years after a New Mexico
woman won a controversial $2.9-million verdict after she spilled
McDonald's coffee into her lap, badly burning her legs.
(Mark Lennihan / Associated Press)
A woman has
filed suit against McDonald’s Corp., saying she was burned by hot
coffee that spilled on her at one of the fast-food chain’s Los Angeles
restaurants.
The
lawsuit comes 20 years after a jury awarded $2.9 million to a woman who
was badly burned after she spilled hot coffee into her lap at a
McDonald’s in Albuquerque. That verdict was widely criticized and became
a rallying cry for advocates of legal reform.
A judge later reduced the verdict to $640,000 and the case settled out of court for an undisclosed amount.
The new
case was filed by Paulette Carr, who said she was injured Jan. 12, 2012,
after ordering the coffee at the drive-through window of a McDonald’s
on Sepulveda Boulevard in Van Nuys. She seeks unspecified monetary
damages in the lawsuit, filed Tuesday in Los Angeles County Superior
Court.
“The lid
for the hot coffee was negligently, carelessly and improperly placed on
the coffee cup … resulting in the lid coming off the top of the coffee
at the window, causing the hot coffee to spill onto the plaintiff,” Carr
said in the lawsuit.
The lawsuit does not describe the severity of
Carr’s injuries. Her attorney, Sheri Manning, did not respond to a
request for comment. A McDonald’s spokeswoman also did not respond to a
request for comment.
The 1994 verdict attracted worldwide media
attention and was mocked by radio and television talk-show hosts and in
one episode of the television comedy, “Seinfeld.” The verdict was also
cited by proponents of tort reform.
Relatives of the woman injured in the 1992 coffee
spill said the verdict was justified, noting the woman suffered
third-degree burns that required skin graft surgery. They said
McDonald’s directed its franchises to serve coffee at dangerously hot
levels.
No comments:
Post a Comment